![]() They determined that currently available battery technology is prohibitively expensive for long-term energy storage. Researchers at Caltech and the Carnegie Institute for Science examined energy-storage options and multiple decades' worth of data on wind and solar availability to identify obstacles standing in the way of a transition to renewable energy.The stations use smart algorithms to coordinate charging schedules with the Institute's existing electrical infrastructure to minimize the total charging cost. A Caltech group led by Resnick Sustainability Institute researcher Steven Low developed and installed adaptive charging stations on campus for electric vehicles.A 2012 modeling study conducted by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory determined that renewable energy resources accessed with commercially available technologies could supply 80 percent of the total generated electricity in the U.S. A model can reveal which combination of electricity sources and energy-storage systems has the lowest cost while always meeting demand. Models calculate potential production from different technologies and demands over time. Researchers use computer models to test the feasibility and estimate the cost of renewable electrical systems.Scientists and engineers are identifying technological and policy solutions to these challenges: The increasing use of electric vehicles and other technology requires that the grid of the future can grow to accommodate them.Home solar panels position some consumers to contribute power back to the grid, requiring new economic models.This can cause an imbalance between the amount of electricity available on the grid and the amount needed. Renewable energy sources, especially wind and solar power, fluctuate more than conventional sources.Renewable energy generation systems like solar panels and wind turbines are often located in open spaces far away from urban areas, thus creating a need for more storage (e.g., pumped hydroelectric energy storage or batteries) and transmission (e.g., power lines) capability. Conventional grids have relied on coal-fired or nuclear power stations located near areas of high electricity demand.Despite a near tripling in land used by the power sector in southern states, the northeast would experience the greatest visible change with over 10 percent of land devoted to energy generation in nine states.To address climate change, humans need to reduce the amount of fossil fuel burned to produce energy.īut connecting renewable, or alternative, energy sources with the grid presents both opportunities and challenges. To investigate where the impact would be felt most intensely, the authors applied their power densities to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Renewable Electricity Futures Scenarios. Offshore wind will help, and future technologies such as algae farms may be another option to avoid land competition." "To avoid competition, rooftop solar will be the best bet-providing clean power that doesn't compete with other land uses. "The very low power densities of biomass make it a difficult sell, especially since the land on which it is produced can sometimes be used for growing food instead," Beherens says. With an increasing population, and the need for food and housing, land will be at a premium moving into the middle of the century. The analysis also found that solar power densities are continuously increasing over time, with research suggesting that new three-dimensional designs could reach over three to five times today's figures by the middle of the century. "So, while renewable energies take up more space, that space will be less polluted, and can be developed for multiple uses such as farming around the base of wind turbines." "However, the production of fossil fuels is a very dirty business," says Paul Behrens, environmental scientist at Leiden University. Solar and wind power needs around 40-50 times more space than coal and 90-100 times more space than gas. They found that power densities can vary by as much as 1000 times, with biomass the lowest (at 0.8 W/m2) and natural gas the highest (at 1000 W/m2). The results can be applied to other countries as well. power densities across the scientific literature and compared the power density for nine specific energy types. For the first time, researchers at the University of Leiden, Netherlands, gathered 177 estimates of U.S. One way to compare them is to use the concept of power density – the average electrical power produced in one horizontal square metre of infrastructure. Different fuel types need different amounts of space, and renewable energies generally need more space than fossil fuels.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |